New Jersey Outshines 48 of Its Peers in Solar Power

[Dan Moadus]

Dennis displays the classic "progressive" philosophy that is shared with all the other leftist, whether they be greens, liberals, socialists or marxist. It's hallmark is a complete disregard for the poor. Their rhetoric is filled with claims of how they want to lift the worker from poverty, when in reality "people" occupy the lowest rung on their concern ladder. Take for instance my last post, where I point out to him that the very article he posted claims that solar energy will be more expensive than conventional energy. Do you think he cares? Not one wit. He, like the rest of his "green" friends care more for "mother earth" than human beings.

He knows perfectly well that many people in our Country are barely able to hang on due to the bad economy, yet it means nothing to him that solar power would raise their electric bills dramatically, just as the Cap and Trade bill is set to do. He is like Tim Ryan; both government employees with secure incomes who couldn't care less about the poor. Their agendas come first.

[sfc_oliver]

As previously pointed out I believe our electricity is generated by Nuclear power. And I would have no problem with a Nuclear plant in my back yard. been there done that. Still here and I don't glow in the dark.

[irishbobcat]

Dan and Everett,


Please stick the nuke plant in your back yard and keep it out of mine.....

Enjoy your three eyes and green skin........

[sfc_oliver]

Agreed Dan, but some people believe we should spend all our money going green, as punishment I suppose.

If we simply give science time to research and develop the next round of energy I'm sure it will be well worth it.

[Dan Moadus]

Here is the key paragraph in Dennis' "cut and paste", article talking about energy from solar panels.

"Even though panel prices have fallen amid abundant supplies of polysilicon, the primary material used to make panels, the electricity still costs more than power generated from conventional fossil-fuel sources. "We've got to stop pretending solar power will lower the cost of energy. It's going to increase the cost, and people have got to understand why it's worth more," said PSEG's Mr. Izzo. He listed the names of pollutants produced by coal or gas incineration that don't occur with solar technology."

The reductions in so called pollutants are no better than nuclear energy, which would lower electric bills if the electric companies didn't have to fight their way through court every time they tried to install one.

[irishbobcat]

New Jersey Outshines 48 of Its Peers in Solar Power
 

  Aug 3, 2009
Wall Street Journal
   
New Jersey Outshines 48 of Its Peers in Solar Power

By REBECCA SMITH and RUSSELL GOLD

Lacking California's Sunshine and Deserts, State Capitalizes on Utility Poles and Flat Industrial Roofs to Claim No. 2 Spot

New Jersey's biggest utility is outfitting 200,000 utility poles with solar panels, part of the state's embrace of a try-anything strategy that has made it the nation's second-biggest producer of solar energy behind California.

Instead of bemoaning what it doesn't have -- bright sunshine, high winds, empty land -- New Jersey has looked for places where solar capacity can be squirreled away inconspicuously. In addition to utility poles, the state is pushing solar panels for industrial locations with many flat roofs.

FedEx Corp., for example, said Thursday it will begin installing solar panels atop its distribution hub in Woodbridge, N.J., next month. Covering about three acres and capable of generating 2.42 megawatts of electricity, it is expected to be the largest rooftop solar facility in the U.S. when completed in November. The solar array will satisfy about 30% of the facility's electricity needs.

Other states may adopt New Jersey's practical approach, if Congress pushes ahead with plans to create a national renewable-energy mandate. In Southeastern states, this could mean burning more wood chips or farm waste to make electricity.

"We don't have the land to do big, grid-connected, utility-scale solar projects, so we've had to think more creatively," said Ralph Izzo, chief executive of Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. The big utility received regulatory approval this week to install 40 megawatts of solar panels on utility poles and another 40 megawatts at its industrial yards and on rooftops.

Rooftop projects avoid the environmental hurdles associated with the use of pristine, desert locations, often sought out in Western states like California. Nor is there the problem of trying to get leases from the federal government, the biggest landowner in the West. And, of course, when solar energy is scattered on rooftops, it's literally sitting right on top of customers, so there is no need for major new transmission lines.

"We need to break away from the mindset of putting solar energy where there's lots of land but no people," said Mr. Izzo.

Looking Back at Solar Power

Journal articles on solar power developments in the 1950s:

Making Solar Power Devices Is Wide Open Field, Scientist Says (Oct. 14, 1954)Companies, Scientists, Focus on New Solar Products and Processes (March 24, 1958)The Garden State's generous financial incentives for solar installation are helping to generate interest. "I've had plenty of people ask me, 'Why New Jersey? Why not Arizona?' " said Paul Vicarro, a facilities managing director at FedEx. "The answer is: That is where the money is, that is where incentives are to make the deal financially viable."

California also is on a solar tear. It wants "a million solar roofs" a decade from now, and is spending $3.3 billion on subsidies, hoping to get 3,000 megawatts installed. More than 158 megawatts of grid-tied solar power were installed in California last year, double the amount installed in 2007. Since the 1980s, California has installed nearly 500 megawatts of grid-tied solar power, equivalent to one large power plant, but still a tiny fraction of the 40,000 megawatts the state needs on a summer day.

New Jersey's $514 million program will double its solar capacity to 160 megawatts by 2013, and will be funded by utility customers. Costs will be defrayed slightly by a 30% federal tax credit, roughly $1 million a year in proceeds from the sale of solar renewable energy credits. In addition, solar energy fetches higher prices in the state's deregulated market, because it's produced at peak times.

PSEG will get more than electricity from the pole-mounted systems, which cost about $1,000 apiece. The solar units will have a radio capability, so they can alert the utility to outages and relay other grid data. "As they deploy these systems, they get a smart grid network," said Shihab Kuran, chief executive of Petra Solar in Plainfield, N.J., which is manufacturing the systems locally.

Jesse Pichel, an alternative-energy analyst with Piper Jaffray & Co., said a change in government incentives should stimulate more solar development. Beginning Aug. 1, renewable-energy companies can get cash grants from the federal government, instead of a credit against taxable income, for 30% of the cost of projects. The change will make it easier to finance projects.

Even though panel prices have fallen amid abundant supplies of polysilicon, the primary material used to make panels, the electricity still costs more than power generated from conventional fossil-fuel sources. "We've got to stop pretending solar power will lower the cost of energy. It's going to increase the cost, and people have got to understand why it's worth more," said PSEG's Mr. Izzo. He listed the names of pollutants produced by coal or gas incineration that don't occur with solar technology.

Jeanne Fox, president of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, said her state has 4,000 solar installations, or "more per square mile than California." There are limits, though, she added, "because the ratepayers can't afford to have solar everywhere, even though the cost is dropping."

New Jersey's goal is to garner 3% of its electricity from the sun and 12% from offshore wind by 2020, part of a larger effort to meet 30% of the state's electricity needs through clean sources.

Write to Rebecca Smith at rebecca.smith@wsj.com and Russell Gold at russell.gold@wsj.com
   
   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why can't Ohio be second or third in the country with solar power? Is it our state leadership and politicians?



Dennis Spisak

Mahononing Valley Green Party

Ohio Green party

www.ohiogreens.org

www.votespisak.org/thinkgreen.