Candidate for 17th Congressional District......Dan Moadus

[Dan Moadus]

You continue to amaze me with your responses. What must it be like to live life as a liberal, where the bulk of ones concern seems to be whether or not someone's feelings are hurt. You haven't addressed a single issue that I brought up. All you have done is accused me of being a racist, which if the truth be told doesn't bother me a bit, yet continue to avoid engaging me on the substance of any issues. How about an answer. Are you bothered by Cass Sunstein's remark that laws should be interpreted by the President and his advisers instead of the courts, or not?

Same goes for your examples of racism from World Net Daily. I reread each article and don't see a problem, but I of course, lack the finely tuned sensitivity of a liberal.

By the way, what is your blog? I would like to check it out.

[Towntalk]

First, I will NOT engage in mud slinging here ... I have a blog for that purpose, and only the owners of this site can shut me up when I disagree with someone.

If you want to rely on WorldNetDaily for your news that's your business or any other Far Right web site that tries to pass itself off as "news" that's your business, but don't expect us to swallow it.

By the way, I have a deep distrust of candidates that resort to name calling: 

"Of all the idiots Obama surrounds himself with, Sunstein may be the most unbelievable."

You asked for examples: try these:

The tragedy of Anglo-Saxon self-hatred
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56300


A July 4th toast to Thomas Jefferson
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=102852

The new political-correctness police
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=24670

Judgment Day in Mystery Babylon?
http://web.archive.org/web/20010917014615/http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=24458

Another example:

Conservative news website WorldNetDaily.com, which publishes right-wing pundit Ann Coulter's weekly syndicated column, has revised its version of Coulter's February 23 column to include her original description of Hearst Newspapers columnist Helen Thomas as an "old Arab." WorldNetDaily promoted the revision on its March 9 front page as "Coulter's original, unsanitized column."
Coulter's reference to "that old Arab Helen Thomas" appears in the version of the column that Coulter posted on her personal website, but her distributor, Universal Press Syndicate, sent out an edited version to its client publications, which referred to Thomas instead as "that dyspeptic, old Helen Thomas." But despite this difference, Coulter retained the Universal copyright label beneath the version of the column posted on her site, as Media Matters for America noted. Following Media Matters' item, Universal negotiated an agreement with Coulter regarding the use of Universal copyright labels on AnnCoulter.com. Editor & Publisher reported: [A]ll columns on AnnCoulter.com will say "distributed by Universal Press Syndicate (c) Ann Coulter" if the print and Web versions of the column are the same.

If the versions are not the same, the line will say "(c) Ann Coulter" only. "This applies to columns that may be of different lengths, with different headlines, and with different copy from the edited version," [Universal director of communications Kathie] Kerr said.

WorldNetDaily added an editor's note at the beginning of Coulter's column, which reads:

This column by Ann Coulter first ran on Feb. 23, and has since been modified to reflect Ann Coulter's original words rather the [sic] edited version distributed by Universal Syndicate. In the version Universal Syndicate distributed, the phrase "... that old Arab Helen Thomas ..." was replaced with "... that dyspeptic, old Helen Thomas ..."



Ann Coulter article as published by WorldNetDaily:

Press passes can't be that hard to come by if the White House allows that old Arab Helen Thomas to sit within yards of the president. Still, it would be suspicious if Dowd were denied a press pass while someone from "Talon News" got one, even if he is a better reporter.

[Dan Moadus]

Please, "Towntalk", you have used every diversionary liberal trick to discredit my citation of a quote by one of Obama's idiots, but I am not going to let you get away with it. If you can not substantiate a claim that the quote in World Net Daily if false then you should just be quiet.

By the way. Did you just accuse the "right" of being racist against Muslims? What race is a Muslim? And what race is Dennis?

[Towntalk]

If you can't read racism into the tirades against Obama ... the tirades against Muslims ... the tirades against folks like our Dennis who believe in global warming ... not to mention the tone of the polls they take, then we should have second thoughts about your candidacy for Congress.

The shame of it all is that this same web site professes to be Christian or at the very least the great defender of the fauth.

[Dan Moadus]

Dan:

To use anything from WorldNetDaily doesn't say much for you, and it is the very last source you should foist on us.

When I put my website together I refused to use this extreme right wing site because of it's hate filled articles, but chose carefully those conservative sites that do not preach hate and intollarance.

I generally don't try to determine whether a site is "hate filled" or not, I usually concern myself more with, is the article true or not. If I start to read a lot of things that end up not being verifiable, I quit reading that site. Have you seen many things not true coming from World Net Daily? Can you cite some examples.

Regarding the recent quote I posted by Cass Sunstein, the statement was the central thesis of Sunstein's 2006 Yale Law School paper.

[Towntalk]

Dan:

To use anything from WorldNetDaily doesn't say much for you, and it is the very last source you should foist on us.

When I put my website together I refused to use this extreme right wing site because of it's hate filled articles, but chose carefully those conservative sites that do not preach hate and intollarance.

[Towntalk]

Dan:

When are you going to speak out on this issue???

Madeleine Albright: USA No Longer Intends To Be World's No.1 State
http://english.pravda.ru/business/finance/18-09-2009/109362-Madeleine_Albright-0

Obama Becomes Europe's 'National Hero'
http://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/18-09-2009/109377-obama_europe-0

Obama's Night Call to Europe Changes World
http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/17-09-2009/109344-missile_defense-0

Putin Praises U.S. Missile Shield Decision, Urges Removal of Trade Barriers
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/383619.html

[sfc_oliver]

This character is completely wacko. And still the left defends the czars of their master.

[Dan Moadus]

Of all the idiots Obama surrounds himself with, Sunstein may be the most unbelievable. Forget that he thinks animals should be able to sue people, that's just idiocy, his latest comment is the most ludicrous. He say's that the interpretation of laws should not be left to our Nation's court system, but should be the domain of our leaders. Apparently he skipped school on the day "checks and balances" were discussed. You can see for yourself here: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=110103

[sfc_oliver]

"Disclaimer: Yes, I'm aware that the young people who shot this video and conducted the interviews are calling themselves the New Left Media. Yes, I'm aware that they were probably selective in who they kept in the final edit."


Glad you said it Rusty.........

[Rick Rowlands]

Its more fun to put words in your mouth.

[Rick Rowlands]

So Rusty,  I must assume from your replies that you do not care one whit about the amount of debt our government is racking up.  Is there any point at which you might say that it is too much.  Obviously not, because as soon as someone speaks up against the growth of government you are quick to shoot that person down.  Are you so blinded by partisanship that you cannot see the common threat to our country by the insane government spending?  Yes Bush increased the debt by 5 Trillion.  Some of that was necessary war spending.  When he started passing those massive domestic spending bills many conservatives realized that he was no conservative. 

You know what I meant by my changing the past comment, but you wanted to twist it into something that I did not say or mean. 

BTW, could you expound on why liberals are always so angry?

[Dan Moadus]

Rusty says, Bush increased the national debt by over $5 TRILLION!! But I guess that's pocket change to you conservatives and tea partiers.

Rusty is correct, but it took Bush 8 years to do it.  The Debt is predicted to grow by $3 Trillion just this year under Obama. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt

[Dan Moadus]

You're comments were just that; comments. No substance whatsoever. Are you an economist? Are you a congressional budget expert? Are you a doctor?

If medicare and medicaid are filled with waste and abuse, why didn't republicans and their conservative base address this during the 12 years they were in power?

Here's some straight talk: NOBODY has a damn clue about what is going to come out of congress in the way of health care reform and what it's effect on the budget will be, especially you, Mr. Moadus.

But how convenient of you to forget one of Obama's insisted provisions on ANY health care legislation that should come to his desk: if the program results in an increase of the budget deficit, it will be mandatory that SPENDING CUTS be enacted to offset them. Not an increase in taxes. Maybe you were listening to a different speech than the rest of the world.

And I find it much easier to justify spending billions of dollars on AMERICANS than on fighting wars overseas against intangible enemies.

You're kidding us right? Do you think we should be reassured by what Obama says? Show us the bill that has that provision in it, and I'll admit you are right. How about when he said he wouldn't sign any bill with earmarks then proceeded to sign one with 9,000 of them.

Oh, and let me remind you. The troops are still in Iraq, and Obama is asking for more in Afghanistan.

[sfc_oliver]

We have learned where racism comes from, we have seen who is teaching racism and where it is being taught.

"If you are in a hole and need a helping hand, and a hand reaches out to you, You do not first look at the color of the hand." (Quote from an Army General whose name I forget)