mahoningvalley.info
Thursday, 03 July 2008
Navigate this Site
Home
Forum
Community Calendar
Community Listings
About Our Valley & Youngstown, Ohio
News Articles
Submit an Article
Article Archives
Photo Gallery
Classified Ads
Employment/Jobs
News Feeds
Sports
Contact Us
Search
Site Map
Official Local Sites
City & Township 
County 
State 
Live Local Scanners
Youngstown, Ohio, Live Scanner Feeds Fire & Police
Weather Links
Closings/Delays 
Local 
National 
Road Conditions 

Live Weather Radio for NE Ohio (Click!)
Weather at a Glance
Chance Rain Showers, Probability Of Precipitation: 100% Today: Chance Rain Showers
Hi 75°F
Lo 54°F
Chance Thunderstorms, Probability Of Precipitation: 40% Tomorrow: Chance Thunderstorms
Hi 77°F
Lo 55°F
Current Conditions:
Overcast
65°F
Restaurant Menus
3 Sisters Cafe (PDF) 
Alberini's 
Coney Dog Shop 
Cumming's (PDF) 
Paprika Cafe Menu 
Phoenician Grill Menu 
Salsitas (PDF) 
THE WARREN PHILHARMONIC CONCERT OF MARCH 29, 2008. PDF  | Print |
Written by Jerome K. Stephens   

THE WARREN PHILHARMONIC CONCERT OF MARCH 29, 2008.

PACKARD MUSIC HALL, WARREN, OHIO.

Jerome K. Stephens. April 4, 2008.

 

     The title of the Warren Philharmonic program at the Packard Music Hall in Warren, Ohio, on Saturday evening, March 29, 2008, was “Spring Fling – Sing Alleluia!” Sing alleluia indeed. The program consisted of three of the most joyous compositions in the standard symphony orchestra repertoire. These were the Second Brandenburg Concerto by Johann Sebastian Bach, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart’s Exsultate, Jubilate, and the Symphony No. 7 by Ludwig Van Beethoven.

     Bach’s Second Brandenburg Concerto, opened the program on a high note, literally. It was one of a set of six commissioned by the Margrave of Brandenburg during a visit by Bach to his court in 1719. Bach delivered them 2 years later, but there is no record of any acknowledgement. It may be that the musicians of the Potsdam court found them to be too difficult to play. Bach was already at work on his seminal Well Tempered Clavier, the first volume of which was published in 1722. This may have influenced his work on the Brandenburg Concertos.

     At any rate, they disappeared into the Margrave’s archives, and eventually were sold for a pittance at the Margrave’s death. Fortunately, they were acquired by one of Bach’s students, and eventually found their way into the Royal Library in Berlin. From there, they emerged to find their way into the symphonic repertoire.

     As a part of that repertoire, the performances can, at times, be quite heavy handed, although a recording of a performance by an orchestra led by Pablo Casals, which introduced me to these marvelous compositions, was not. I am pleased to say that the performance of the Second Brandenburg Concerto as performed by the Warren Philharmonic under Maestra Davenny Wyner was not heavy handed at all. It approached as closely as is possible today to the orchestra Bach may have visualized. Also, it was not played as though it was intended to accompany a running of the Indianapolis 500, a style of playing Baroque compositions under the guise of “authenticism” that has become all too common today.

    The concerto is scored for four solo instruments, trumpet, flute, oboe, and violin, played respectively by Christopher Krummel, Kathryn Thomas Umble, Elise Bower Belk, and John Wilcox. The trumpet was played in the first and third movements.
     When it was being played, the trumpet tended to dominate, but it did not overpower. Mr. Krummel played what is scored in the high or clarino range in true clarino style. In Bach’s day, this meant the fourth octave of the natural trumpet. Hearing it played so at that concert was a real treat.
    Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was 17 in 1773 when he composed that which is considered to be among the top 10 compositions that form the current popular image of the composer. This is the motet, Exsultate, Jubilate, K. 165. It was composed for the castrato Venanzio Rauzzini, whose singing in the Milan premier of Mozart’s opera seria, Lucio Silla, despite his upsetting pre-performance histronics, had performed very successfully in the opera. This impressed the young Mozart very favorably, and he announced his intent to compose the motet in January of 1773 especially for  Rauzzini. (The opera itself was very successful. It has been dismissed in the past as “an unfortunate and uneven piece of work,” but recent opinion has done a 180 degree turn as to its importance.) With its standard fast, slow, fast format, this motet could almost be considered a concerto for voice and orchestra. In fact, I have heard referred to as just that.

     The soprano soloist was Marian Vogel. She has a clear lyric soprano voice with a moderate timbre and a seamless range from the lower to the upper register. And no, she was not using any electronic amplification. Her voice just naturally fills the auditorium without blasting. I even had the impression at times that she was holding back. Her singing evoked in me memories of Lotte Lehman. One item that I did not notice was the excessive vibrato that can mar solos with the runs and trills that were in the Mozart composition. I have heard too many such performers in recent years. Vibrato and semiquavers (to use the British term) do not mix well at all. MS Vogel should be able to do very well with the Bach and Handel repertoire.

     The Symphony No. 7 by Ludwig Van Beethoven concluded the evening. This was completed in the summer of 1812, and premiered in December, 1813. I have heard it referred to as a “dance” symphony because of its many exuberant themes and rhythmic vehemence, and Richard Wagner called it “the dance in its highest condition, the happiest realization of the movements of the body in ideal form.” The audience at the first performance was reported to be spellbound. The second movement is familiar to those of an older generation because of use of the theme in the “Lone Ranger” radio broadcasts beginning in the late 1930s to indicate dramatic situations of great seriousness and potential tragedy.

     A work that shared the bill with the symphony at the first performance was Wellington’s Victory, or the Battle of Vittori.,” This was an orchestration of a potboiler composition intended for performance on an mechanical brass band called a Panharmonicon. This was developed by Johann Nepomuk Mälzel, who had attempted to help Beethoven deal with his increasing deafness. Beethoven found it to be amusing to use this to rest from the more concentrated tasks.

     The performance Saturday was up to the usual high standards of Maestra Davenny Wyner and the Warren Philharmonic. Despite the relatively small size of the orchestra Saturday, which may have been smaller than that employed by Beethoven. But, as Nikolaus Harnoncourt pointed out in his book of essays, The Musical Dialogue,” doubling the number of strings only increases the volume by 10 per cent. The performance went far beyond adequate.

     One thing that is noticeable in Warren Philharmonic performances. That is the complete absence of podium histrionics. Nothing distracts one from the music. I have worked under her, and it is her baton and her eyes that convey her desires and intent. She is a better conductor than an international personality to the southeast who found it expedient to walk out of his contract.

 
 
Home arrow News Articles arrow The Arts arrow THE WARREN PHILHARMONIC CONCERT OF MARCH 29, 2008.

Copyright MahoningValley.info 2008